1967 Austin A 60 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Avalanche
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Avalanche is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Avalanche is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Avalanche (307 HP) has 247 more horse power than 1967 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Avalanche should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin A 60.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Avalanche (335 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2012 Chevrolet Avalanche will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin A 60 | 2012 Chevrolet Avalanche | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | A 60 | Avalanche |
Year Released | 1967 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 307 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 335 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.9:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 117 L |