1967 Austin A 60 vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Holden Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Cruze (161 HP) has 101 more horse power than 1967 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin A 60.
Because 1967 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Cruze (360 Nm) has 238 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Austin A 60. (122 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin A 60 | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Austin | Holden |
Model | A 60 | Cruze |
Year Released | 1967 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 161 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 360 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2685 mm |