1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1948 Humber Super Snipe
To start off, 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 4,086 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III (146 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1948 Humber Super Snipe. (100 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III should accelerate faster than 1948 Humber Super Snipe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Humber Super Snipe weights approximately 566 kg more than 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 1948 Humber Super Snipe | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Humber |
| Model | 3000 Mk III | Super Snipe |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1948 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 4086 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 146 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83.4 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 120 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1746 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2990 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 68 L |
