1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1973 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 1973 Cadillac Calais is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. (146 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 1065 kg more than 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 1973 Cadillac Calais | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Cadillac |
Model | 3000 Mk III | Calais |
Year Released | 1967 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 7734 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 2245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 5880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 3310 mm |