1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Starion
To start off, 1982 Mitsubishi Starion is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III (146 HP) has 1 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Starion. (145 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Starion.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Mitsubishi Starion (251 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. (165 Nm). This means 1982 Mitsubishi Starion will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 1982 Mitsubishi Starion | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Mitsubishi |
Model | 3000 Mk III | Starion |
Year Released | 1967 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2555 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 145 HP |
Torque | 165 Nm | 251 Nm |
Top Speed | 195 km/hour | 193 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |