1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1998 Honda SSM
To start off, 1998 Honda SSM is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Honda SSM (286 Nm) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. (165 Nm). This means 1998 Honda SSM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 1998 Honda SSM | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Honda |
| Model | 3000 Mk III | SSM |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1999 cc |
| Horse Power | 146 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 286 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2580 mm |
