1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1998 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 1998 SsangYong Musso is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1998 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 1998 SsangYong Musso | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | SsangYong |
| Model | 3000 Mk III | Musso |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 146 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1740 mm |
