1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 2005 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2005 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III weights approximately 10 kg more than 2005 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 2005 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 2005 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Nissan |
Model | 3000 Mk III | Bluebird |
Year Released | 1967 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1450 mm |