1967 Autobianchi Bianchina vs. 1980 Lotus Eclat
To start off, 1980 Lotus Eclat is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Autobianchi Bianchina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Autobianchi Bianchina would be higher. At 2,174 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Lotus Eclat is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Lotus Eclat (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1967 Autobianchi Bianchina. (22 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Lotus Eclat should accelerate faster than 1967 Autobianchi Bianchina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Lotus Eclat weights approximately 604 kg more than 1967 Autobianchi Bianchina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Lotus Eclat (217 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Autobianchi Bianchina. (34 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1980 Lotus Eclat will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Autobianchi Bianchina.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Autobianchi Bianchina | 1980 Lotus Eclat | |
Make | Autobianchi | Lotus |
Model | Bianchina | Eclat |
Year Released | 1967 | 1980 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Rear | Middle |
Engine Size | 499 cc | 2174 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 22 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 34 Nm | 217 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 67.4 mm | 95.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 70 mm | 76.2 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 9.4:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1104 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2990 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 67 L |