1967 Autobianchi Primula vs. 1966 Jaguar E-Type

To start off, 1967 Autobianchi Primula is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jaguar E-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jaguar E-Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Jaguar E-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Jaguar E-Type (265 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 1967 Autobianchi Primula. (57 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Jaguar E-Type should accelerate faster than 1967 Autobianchi Primula. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Jaguar E-Type weights approximately 415 kg more than 1967 Autobianchi Primula. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Compare all specifications:

1967 Autobianchi Primula 1966 Jaguar E-Type
Make Autobianchi Jaguar
Model Primula E-Type
Year Released 1967 1966
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1221 cc 4235 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 57 HP 265 HP
Engine RPM 5300 RPM 5400 RPM
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 830 kg 1245 kg
Vehicle Length 3800 mm 4690 mm
Vehicle Width 1590 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1280 mm
Wheelbase Size 2310 mm 2670 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 40 L 63 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]