1967 Autobianchi Primula vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Autobianchi Primula. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Autobianchi Primula would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 257 more horse power than 1967 Autobianchi Primula. (57 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1967 Autobianchi Primula. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1028 kg more than 1967 Autobianchi Primula. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Autobianchi Primula | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Cadillac |
| Model | Primula | CTS |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1221 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 57 HP | 314 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 830 kg | 1858 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4788 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1882 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1442 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 68 L |
