1967 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 1967 Bizzarrini A3C is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher. At 5,673 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP) has 197 more horse power than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. (164 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 600 kg more than 1967 Bizzarrini A3C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom has automatic transmission and 1967 Bizzarrini A3C has manual transmission. 1967 Bizzarrini A3C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Bizzarrini A3C | 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Bizzarrini | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | A3C | Phantom |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1950 |
| Engine Size | 5354 cc | 5673 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 361 HP | 164 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1860 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 5770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 3690 mm |
