1967 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1967 Bizzarrini A3C is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 272 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Bizzarrini A3C weights approximately 90 kg more than 1964 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Bizzarrini A3C (510 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 352 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1967 Bizzarrini A3C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Bizzarrini A3C | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Bizzarrini | Triumph |
| Model | A3C | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1964 |
| Engine Size | 5354 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 361 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 510 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2700 mm |
