1967 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 1979 Mercedes-Benz CW
To start off, 1979 Mercedes-Benz CW is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 6,328 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Mercedes-Benz CW is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Mercedes-Benz CW (395 HP @ 5160 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1967 Bizzarrini A3C. (361 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Mercedes-Benz CW should accelerate faster than 1967 Bizzarrini A3C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Bizzarrini A3C weights approximately 10 kg more than 1979 Mercedes-Benz CW.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Mercedes-Benz CW (600 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Bizzarrini A3C. (510 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1979 Mercedes-Benz CW will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Bizzarrini A3C.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Bizzarrini A3C | 1979 Mercedes-Benz CW | |
Make | Bizzarrini | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | A3C | CW |
Year Released | 1967 | 1979 |
Engine Size | 5354 cc | 6328 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 361 HP | 395 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5160 RPM |
Torque | 510 Nm | 600 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1120 mm |