1967 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 1984 Cadillac Cimarron
To start off, 1984 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 237 more horse power than 1984 Cadillac Cimarron. (124 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 1984 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Bizzarrini A3C weights approximately 110 kg more than 1984 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Bizzarrini A3C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Bizzarrini A3C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Bizzarrini A3C | 1984 Cadillac Cimarron | |
| Make | Bizzarrini | Cadillac |
| Model | A3C | Cimarron |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1984 |
| Engine Size | 5354 cc | 2844 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 361 HP | 124 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2580 mm |
