1967 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 1987 Zastava Yugo
To start off, 1987 Zastava Yugo is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP) has 295 more horse power than 1987 Zastava Yugo. (66 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 1987 Zastava Yugo.
Because 1967 Bizzarrini A3C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Bizzarrini A3C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Zastava Yugo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Bizzarrini A3C (510 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 412 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Zastava Yugo. (98 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1967 Bizzarrini A3C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Zastava Yugo.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Bizzarrini A3C | 1987 Zastava Yugo | |
Make | Bizzarrini | Zastava |
Model | A3C | Yugo |
Year Released | 1967 | 1987 |
Engine Size | 5354 cc | 1290 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 361 HP | 66 HP |
Torque | 510 Nm | 98 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2510 mm |