1967 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 1995 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1995 Ford Mustang is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Mustang weights approximately 223 kg more than 1967 Bizzarrini A3C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Bizzarrini A3C (510 Nm) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Ford Mustang. (386 Nm). This means 1967 Bizzarrini A3C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Bizzarrini A3C | 1995 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Bizzarrini | Ford |
| Model | A3C | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1995 |
| Engine Size | 5354 cc | 4947 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 361 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 510 Nm | 386 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1483 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2580 mm |
