1967 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 2004 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2004 Volvo XC90 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 2004 Volvo XC90. (208 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 2004 Volvo XC90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 778 kg more than 1967 Bizzarrini A3C.
Because 2004 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Bizzarrini A3C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Bizzarrini A3C (510 Nm) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Volvo XC90. (320 Nm). This means 1967 Bizzarrini A3C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Volvo XC90.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Bizzarrini A3C | 2004 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Bizzarrini | Volvo |
| Model | A3C | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 5354 cc | 2435 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 361 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 510 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 2038 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2650 mm |
