1967 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 2005 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2005 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 2005 Ford Thunderbird. (280 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Thunderbird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 492 kg more than 1967 Bizzarrini A3C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Bizzarrini A3C (510 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Thunderbird. (388 Nm). This means 1967 Bizzarrini A3C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Thunderbird.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Bizzarrini A3C | 2005 Ford Thunderbird | |
| Make | Bizzarrini | Ford |
| Model | A3C | Thunderbird |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 5354 cc | 3933 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 361 HP | 280 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 510 Nm | 388 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1752 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2730 mm |
