1967 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (154 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 290 kg more than 1967 Bizzarrini A3C.
Because 1967 Bizzarrini A3C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Bizzarrini A3C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Bizzarrini A3C (510 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 307 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (203 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1967 Bizzarrini A3C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Bizzarrini A3C | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Bizzarrini | Mazda |
Model | A3C | 3 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2009 |
Engine Size | 5354 cc | 2260 cc |
Horse Power | 361 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 510 Nm | 203 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2650 mm |