1967 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 2012 Ford Ka
To start off, 2012 Ford Ka is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 293 more horse power than 2012 Ford Ka. (68 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 2012 Ford Ka.
Because 1967 Bizzarrini A3C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Bizzarrini A3C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Bizzarrini A3C (510 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 404 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Ford Ka. (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1967 Bizzarrini A3C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Bizzarrini A3C | 2012 Ford Ka | |
| Make | Bizzarrini | Ford |
| Model | A3C | Ka |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 5354 cc | 1297 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 361 HP | 68 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 510 Nm | 106 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 3630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2450 mm |
