1967 BMW 2000 vs. 1956 Buick 40
To start off, 1967 BMW 2000 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,279 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Buick 40 weights approximately 604 kg more than 1967 BMW 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 BMW 2000 | 1956 Buick 40 | |
| Make | BMW | Buick |
| Model | 2000 | 40 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1989 cc | 5279 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 217 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1704 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3110 mm |
