1967 BMW 2000 vs. 1963 Triumph Herald
To start off, 1967 BMW 2000 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 1,989 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 BMW 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 BMW 2000 weights approximately 259 kg more than 1963 Triumph Herald.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 BMW 2000 | 1963 Triumph Herald | |
| Make | BMW | Triumph |
| Model | 2000 | Herald |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1989 cc | 1147 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 50 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 841 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2330 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 29 L |
