1967 BMW 2000 vs. 1964 Jaguar MK 10
To start off, 1967 BMW 2000 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jaguar MK 10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jaguar MK 10 would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Jaguar MK 10 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Jaguar MK 10 weights approximately 783 kg more than 1967 BMW 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 BMW 2000 | 1964 Jaguar MK 10 | |
| Make | BMW | Jaguar |
| Model | 2000 | MK 10 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1989 cc | 4235 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 265 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1883 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3050 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 90 L |
