1967 BMW 2000 vs. 1992 Rover 620i
To start off, 1992 Rover 620i is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Rover 620i is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Rover 620i weights approximately 155 kg more than 1967 BMW 2000.
Because 1967 BMW 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 BMW 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Rover 620i, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 BMW 2000 | 1992 Rover 620i | |
| Make | BMW | Rover |
| Model | 2000 | 620i |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1989 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 113 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1255 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 65 L |
