1967 BMW 2000 vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 1,989 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 BMW 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 245 kg more than 1967 BMW 2000.
Because 1967 BMW 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 BMW 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 BMW 2000 | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 2000 | CU-X |
Year Released | 1967 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 99 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 80 L |