1967 BMW 2000 vs. 2003 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2003 Dodge Dakota is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 2,458 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 436 kg more than 1967 BMW 2000.
Because 2003 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 BMW 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 BMW 2000 | 2003 Dodge Dakota | |
| Make | BMW | Dodge |
| Model | 2000 | Dakota |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1989 cc | 2458 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1536 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4980 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2850 mm |
