1967 BMW 2000 vs. 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 4,157 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1066 kg more than 1967 BMW 2000.
Because 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 BMW 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 BMW 2000 | 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 2000 | TrailBlazer |
Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 4157 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 269 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 2166 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 71 L |