1967 BMW 2000 vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 3,376 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 916 kg more than 1967 BMW 2000.
Because 2004 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 BMW 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 BMW 2000 | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | BMW | Toyota |
Model | 2000 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 3376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 188 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 2016 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 100 L |