1967 BMW 2000 vs. 2005 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2005 Cadillac SRX is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 3,556 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 860 kg more than 1967 BMW 2000.
Because 2005 Cadillac SRX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 BMW 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac SRX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 BMW 2000 | 2005 Cadillac SRX | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 2000 | SRX |
Year Released | 1967 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 3556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 255 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2960 mm |