1967 BMW 2000 vs. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 4,394 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1457 kg more than 1967 BMW 2000.
Because 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 BMW 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 BMW 2000 | 2008 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | BMW | Land Rover |
Model | 2000 | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1967 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 4394 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 305 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 2557 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 88 L |