1967 BMW 2000 vs. 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 5,328 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 1319 kg more than 1967 BMW 2000.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 BMW 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 BMW 2000 | 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 2000 | Tahoe |
Year Released | 1967 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 5328 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 284 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 2419 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2070 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1970 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2950 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 98 L |