1967 BMW 2000 vs. 2009 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 2,606 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda BT-50 weights approximately 450 kg more than 1967 BMW 2000.
Because 2009 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 BMW 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 BMW 2000 | 2009 Mazda BT-50 | |
| Make | BMW | Mazda |
| Model | 2000 | BT-50 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1989 cc | 2606 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 123 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1550 kg |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 50 L |
