1967 BMW 2000 vs. 2010 Ford Flex
To start off, 2010 Ford Flex is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Flex is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Flex weights approximately 928 kg more than 1967 BMW 2000.
Because 1967 BMW 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 BMW 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Flex, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 BMW 2000 | 2010 Ford Flex | |
| Make | BMW | Ford |
| Model | 2000 | Flex |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1989 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 262 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 2028 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 5126 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1928 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1727 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2995 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 70 L |
