1967 BMW 2000 vs. 2011 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2011 Ford Ranger is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 BMW 2000 | 2011 Ford Ranger | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 2000 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1967 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 5171 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3193 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 74 L |