1967 BMW 2000 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 5,328 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche weights approximately 1459 kg more than 1967 BMW 2000.
Because 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 BMW 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 BMW 2000 | 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 2000 | Avalanche |
Year Released | 1967 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 5328 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 316 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 2559 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 5621 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2009 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1946 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3302 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 119 L |