1967 BMW 2000 vs. 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport
To start off, 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 2,013 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport weights approximately 1490 kg more than 1967 BMW 2000.
Because 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 BMW 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 BMW 2000 | 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
Make | BMW | Land Rover |
Model | 2000 | Range Rover Sport |
Year Released | 1967 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 2013 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 503 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 2590 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4783 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2158 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1784 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2745 mm |