1967 Bristol 409 vs. 2001 Honda Passport
To start off, 2001 Honda Passport is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Bristol 409. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Bristol 409 would be higher. At 5,210 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Bristol 409 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Bristol 409 (215 HP) has 25 more horse power than 2001 Honda Passport. (190 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Bristol 409 should accelerate faster than 2001 Honda Passport.
Because 1967 Bristol 409 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Bristol 409. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Honda Passport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Bristol 409 (463 Nm) has 207 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Honda Passport. (256 Nm). This means 1967 Bristol 409 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Honda Passport.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Bristol 409 | 2001 Honda Passport | |
Make | Bristol | Honda |
Model | 409 | Passport |
Year Released | 1967 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5210 cc | 3201 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 190 HP |
Torque | 463 Nm | 256 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2710 mm |