1967 Bristol 409 vs. 2002 Toyota F-1

To start off, 2002 Toyota F-1 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Bristol 409. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Bristol 409 would be higher. At 5,210 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Bristol 409 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Bristol 409 (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2002 Toyota F-1. (183 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Bristol 409 should accelerate faster than 2002 Toyota F-1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota F-1 weights approximately 10 kg more than 1967 Bristol 409.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Bristol 409 (463 Nm) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Toyota F-1. (430 Nm). This means 1967 Bristol 409 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Toyota F-1. 1967 Bristol 409 has automatic transmission and 2002 Toyota F-1 has manual transmission. 2002 Toyota F-1 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1967 Bristol 409 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: