1967 Bristol 409 vs. 2009 Toyota 4Runner

To start off, 2009 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Bristol 409. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Bristol 409 would be higher. At 5,210 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Bristol 409 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota 4Runner (260 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1967 Bristol 409. (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1967 Bristol 409. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Bristol 409 weights approximately 345 kg more than 2009 Toyota 4Runner.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Bristol 409 (463 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Toyota 4Runner. (416 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1967 Bristol 409 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Toyota 4Runner.

Compare all specifications:

1967 Bristol 409 2009 Toyota 4Runner
Make Bristol Toyota
Model 409 4Runner
Year Released 1967 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5210 cc 4664 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 215 HP 260 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 5400 RPM
Torque 463 Nm 416 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 3400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1600 kg 1255 kg
Vehicle Length 4920 mm 4810 mm
Vehicle Width 1740 mm 1920 mm
Vehicle Height 1510 mm 1820 mm
Wheelbase Size 2910 mm 2800 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 81 L 87 L