1967 Bristol 409 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Bristol 409. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Bristol 409 would be higher. At 5,210 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Bristol 409 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Bristol 409 (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2013 Chevrolet Equinox. (180 HP @ 6700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Bristol 409 should accelerate faster than 2013 Chevrolet Equinox. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 211 kg more than 1967 Bristol 409.
Because 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Bristol 409. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Bristol 409 (463 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Chevrolet Equinox. (233 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 1967 Bristol 409 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Chevrolet Equinox.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Bristol 409 | 2013 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | Bristol | Chevrolet |
Model | 409 | Equinox |
Year Released | 1967 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5210 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6700 RPM |
Torque | 463 Nm | 233 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 98.6 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.1 mm | 98 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1811 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4771 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2857 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 71 L |