1967 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1967 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac Brougham (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 55 kg more than 1963 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Cadillac Brougham | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
| Model | Brougham | 62 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2145 kg | 2090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 79 L |
