1967 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1963 MG 1100
To start off, 1967 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 MG 1100 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac Brougham (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1963 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1963 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1320 kg more than 1963 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 MG 1100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Cadillac Brougham | 1963 MG 1100 | |
Make | Cadillac | MG |
Model | Brougham | 1100 |
Year Released | 1967 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2145 kg | 825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2380 mm |