1967 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1978 Renault Rodeo
To start off, 1978 Renault Rodeo is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1465 kg more than 1978 Renault Rodeo.
Because 1967 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Renault Rodeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Cadillac Brougham | 1978 Renault Rodeo | |
| Make | Cadillac | Renault |
| Model | Brougham | Rodeo |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 845 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2145 kg | 680 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2410 mm |
