1967 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1980 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1980 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 665 kg more than 1980 Ford Thunderbird.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Cadillac Brougham | 1980 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Brougham | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1967 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 4186 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2145 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2760 mm |