1967 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1980 ZIL 4104
To start off, 1980 ZIL 4104 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,695 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 ZIL 4104 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 ZIL 4104 (311 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1967 Cadillac Brougham. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 ZIL 4104 should accelerate faster than 1967 Cadillac Brougham. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 ZIL 4104 weights approximately 1190 kg more than 1967 Cadillac Brougham. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Cadillac Brougham | 1980 ZIL 4104 | |
Make | Cadillac | ZIL |
Model | Brougham | 4104 |
Year Released | 1967 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 7695 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 311 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2145 kg | 3335 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 5750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 2100 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 3340 mm |