1967 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1986 Acura Integra
To start off, 1986 Acura Integra is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac Brougham (208 HP) has 95 more horse power than 1986 Acura Integra. (113 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1986 Acura Integra.
Because 1967 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Cadillac Brougham | 1986 Acura Integra | |
Make | Cadillac | Acura |
Model | Brougham | Integra |
Year Released | 1967 | 1986 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 113 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4355 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1665 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2520 mm |