1967 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2000 Tata Safari
To start off, 2000 Tata Safari is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac Brougham (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 2000 Tata Safari. (135 HP @ 5530 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 2000 Tata Safari. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 105 kg more than 2000 Tata Safari. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Tata Safari is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Tata Safari will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Cadillac Brougham | 2000 Tata Safari | |
| Make | Cadillac | Tata |
| Model | Brougham | Safari |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1948 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 135 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5530 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2145 kg | 2040 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1930 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2660 mm |
