1967 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2001 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2001 Ford Econoline is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac Brougham (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2001 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Econoline weights approximately 180 kg more than 1967 Cadillac Brougham.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Cadillac Brougham | 2001 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Brougham | Econoline |
Year Released | 1967 | 2001 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 4194 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2145 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 3510 mm |