1967 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2002 Ford Windstar
To start off, 2002 Ford Windstar is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac Brougham (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 2002 Ford Windstar. (150 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Windstar.
Because 1967 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Cadillac Brougham | 2002 Ford Windstar | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | Brougham | Windstar |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 5103 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1946 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 3066 mm |
